[ic] Problem Maintaining Session

[interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com (Ed LaFrance)]

At 09:05 PM 05/03/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>Ed LaFrance wrote:
>...
> >
> > I think I will go with my original answer. In this context, what happens if
> > you change the above request to a 'GET' and pass the session as
> > mv_session_id=nnnnnnnn ? I am sticking with this because it is the only way
> > I have tried it.
> >
> > This is also a good illustration for why, sooner or later, you have to
> > yield to the logic of a direct response system, like on of the several
> > gateways that are already supported by Interchange.  The gymnastics for
> > handling systems like the above just get too exotic after a while.
> >
> > - Ed L.
>....
>
>Question:
>What is right? mv_session_id=nnnnnnnn or id=nnnnnnnn with IC 4.8.3?
>
>Thanks!
>
>Joachim Leidinger

My understanding is: it depends. For a simple link to a page, it is 
id=nnnnnnnn. For a GET form, it is mv_session_id=nnnnnnnn (passed as one of 
the CGI vars in the query string). At least that seems to be how it is 
intended.

- Ed L.


New Media E.M.S.               Software Solutions for Business
463 Main St., Suite D          eCommerce | Consulting | Hosting
Placerville, CA  95667         edl@newmediaems.com
(530) 622-9421                 http://www.newmediaems.com
(866) 519-4680 Toll-Free       (530) 622-9426 Fax
===============================================================