[ic] Problem Maintaining Session

[interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com (Joachim Leidinger)]

Ed LaFrance wrote:
...
> 
> I think I will go with my original answer. In this context, what happens if
> you change the above request to a 'GET' and pass the session as
> mv_session_id=nnnnnnnn ? I am sticking with this because it is the only way
> I have tried it.
> 
> This is also a good illustration for why, sooner or later, you have to
> yield to the logic of a direct response system, like on of the several
> gateways that are already supported by Interchange.  The gymnastics for
> handling systems like the above just get too exotic after a while.
> 
> - Ed L.
....

Question: 
What is right? mv_session_id=nnnnnnnn or id=nnnnnnnn with IC 4.8.3?

Thanks!

Joachim Leidinger

-- 
Hans-Joachim Leidinger | Dipl.-Phys.Ing. Entwicklung eCommerce
[leidinger@bpanet.de] 
Black Point Arts Internet Solutions GmbH
http://www.bpanet.de