[ic] Random PGP failures

[interchange-users@icdevgroup.org (NOW Website Coordinator)]

I am having problems (I use IC 4.8.6) where sometimes the 
mv_credit_card_info is included with an order, sometimes not.  The error 
log just says:

  [16/November/2002:12:16:43 -0500] store /cgi-bin/store/process.html PGP 
failed with status 0:



which seems to be an unhelpful status code in PGP 6.5.8.   A few times, the 
PGP message was written to pgptemp files and I was able to at least 
retrieve them from there, but the last dropped message was not written to a 
temp file.


I've thought of switching to GPG, but it seems to be a problem for people 
with that program as well -- at least in June, but I can't access the URL 
with some help that people reference:

http://interchange.redhat.com/pipermail/interchange-users/200-March/018636.html

nor can I find it on www.archive.org.

I find in the archives (I can only get the Google ones to work for some 
reason, the Swish ones aren't working) the following thread -- does anyone 
have more info about this -- should I find a traffic setting and set it to 
RPC?:

[ic] Random GPG failures
Brian Kosick interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
Mon Jun 3 10:48:02 2002
·	Previous message: ·	[ic] Hard Core customization
·	Next message: ·	[ic] Random GPG failures
·	Messages sorted by: ·	[ date ] ·	[ thread ] ·	[ subject ] ·	[ author ]

Just to let every one know, this fix has indeed cured my GPG woes, at least
so far, the site went all weekend without a single one.  Quite an
improvement verses 2-3 everyday.  A few things that I noticed about the new
conf.  IC seems to take twice as much memory as before, the new process's
are around 30-40MB/process, whereas previously they were
~20MB/process.  Also, they seem to place less of a load on the CPU when
they run.

At 03:10 PM 5/31/02 -0400, you wrote:
 >At 01:02 PM 5/31/02 -0600, you wrote:
 >> > >Hi,
 >> > >
 >> > >I had somewhat a similar problem, and went nut.  After posting on
 >> > >Interchange, I kindly got a response from Kevin Walsh, who
 >> > pointed me to
 >> > >the following article.  I resolved my issue:
 >> >> >
 >> >>
 >> >http://interchange.redhat.com/pipermail/interchange-users/200-March/018 
636.
 >>html
 >> >>
 >> >
 >> >Thanks Tin and Dan,
 >> >
 >> >         I've implemented the RPC traffic mode, and the MaxServer 0
 >> >suggestions.  More specifically, I followed the articles solution.  (I
 >> >liked the ifdef solution)  I'll watch to see if there are any more errors,
 >> >and let everyone know if this has been resolved.
 >>
 >>I just implemented it as well, but there is already and ifdef TRAFFIC
 >>section of the code so you shouldn't have to add one.  Not sure the effect
 >>if you do either.  Just do a search from the top for TRAFFIC.  You will find
 >>a line that says Variable TRAFFIC low (which you change from low to rpc) and
 >>then the ifdef for "low" followed by one for "rpc".  Just add the MaxServers
 >>0
 >>line to the bottom of that ifdef section.
 >>
 >>By the way, doing an interchange -r every night reduces the frequency a lot
 >>but does NOT solve the problem, as I had posted earlier.  Several days after
 >>that post, it happened again.
 >>
 >>Patrick
 >>
 >>_______________________________________________
 >>interchange-users mailing list
 >>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
 >>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
 >>_______________________________________________
 >>interchange-users mailing list
 >>interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
 >>http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
 >
 >Oops Thanks for pointing that out, I removed the dup entry, and added
 >MaxServers to the appropriate place....