[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Interchange by date
][Interchange by thread
]
[ic] Admin Order Entry
> On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 15:34, Andrew Baerg wrote:
> > I have run into a serious issue with entering orders
> through the admin
> > interface. It seems this issue was raised a while ago:
> >
> >
> http://interchange.redhat.com/archive/interchange-users/2001/m
> sg09214.html
> >
> > Although no resolution was really given. After following the
> > suggestions in the postings, I still have problems. When I place an
> > order in the admin UI, I am logged out and greeted with the
> admin login
> > page. The order gets entered, but I get no confirmation
> and when I go
> > back to order entry after logging back in, the fields are
> still occupied
> > by the previous order, making it /seem/ as though the order
> has not been
> > entered. This poses serious problems for our CSRs entering orders
> > because they have no way of immediately telling if an order has gone
> > through not to mention how confusing the whole thing looks.
> Any ideas
> > anyone? Has this been discussed further in a later thread? If so I
> > could not find it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andrew Baerg
> > Edge Marketing
> > Calgary, AB
> > Canada
> > _______________________________________________
> > interchange-users mailing list
> > interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
> > http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>
>
>
> In case anyone cares about this issue, I have investigated it further
> and submitted the following to bug #361:
>
> It seems to me that the problem lies in Routing. I have
> found that only
> the
> default route is ever performed so that if you remove it, as
> one of the
> suggestions states, the last route defined in catalog.cfg becomes the
> default
> and is the only one which is performed(whether through the admin UI or
> not).
> My temporary solution, which I realize is a horrible hack but which
> works
> without issues, is to define a log Route which includes both log_entry
> stuff and
> log_transaction stuff and decides which to do based on a
> variable I pass
> it.
> receipt.html also uses the variable to decide whether to diplay the
> admin UI or
> the customer UI. Anyways, that's my two cents for what it's worth.
>
> If indeed the larger issue is with routing, then it seems to me that
> this is indeed a big problem. If you can only ever use the default
> route, then what is the point in having multiple routes defined?
>
> Anyways, if anyone wants more info on my ugly solution, which does in
> fact work, let me know.
Can you post this "solution" :-) I would like to do this if there are no
other "complications", I am doing quite a bit of UI order entry and its
just a big inconvenience.
_____
Sincerely,
Aaron Hazelton
>>Hazenet<<
aaron@hazenet.net
>
> Andrew Baerg
> Edge Marketing
> _______________________________________________
> interchange-users mailing list
> interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
> http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users
>