[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Interchange by date
][Interchange by thread
]
[ic] Scalable
Quoting music@labyrinth.net.au (music@labyrinth.net.au):
>
>
> > At 04:46 PM 3/15/2002 -0600, you wrote:
> > >I read that Interchange is optimized for only around 100 items. I was
> > >wondering if it can scale any higher with an external database (ie MySQL,
> or
> > >Oracle). Or has anyone seen corruption, or performance problems with
> more
> > >than 100 items in a catalog despite an external database. I hope this
> all
> > >makes sense, thnx.
>
> I run several catalogs that are in production and taking orders.
> One store has 140000 titles in a secondary product table running using mySQL
> Redhat 7.2 (256KB RAM)
> Complex searches, or even a search through 'All categories' usually return a
> result list within about 2 or 3 seconds, even when hundreds of matches are
> found!
>
> Interchange runs a lot faster (10x?) than the portals we build using
> PHP/mySQL.
I don't think that is true, but I am glad you think so. 8-)
>
> (Our only problem with IC is the dropping of encrypted card numbers in
> orders which is happening fairly frequently. The create order, encrypt
> card#, e-mail user and store owner is obviously more resource hungry than
> complex searches. Still trying to work this one out though I am wondering if
> it is a sendmail/reverse DNS problem or something similar that is stalling
> the process.)
>
Did you see the thread started by Ron Phipps, where it is suggested
you move to PreFork mode (Variable TRAFFIC rpc) and set MaxServers
to 0?
--
Red Hat, Inc., 3005 Nichols Rd., Hamilton, OH 45013
phone +1.513.523.7621 <mheins@redhat.com>
Software axiom: Lack of speed kills.
- Follow-Ups:
- [ic] Scalable
- From: interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com (Loy Ellen Gross)
- [ic] Scalable
- From: interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com (interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com)