[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Interchange by date
][Interchange by thread
]
mod_rewrite example? Does anyone have an was RE: [ic] Modifying link program and links to get rid of ?s and &'s in URL
Thank you for your e-mail.
I've been struggling to understand RewriteRule for hours and cant get
past simple rewrites eg. no wildcards. But you have saved me hours
investigating other means.
Do you have a mod_rewrite example for Interchange? I'm basicly using a
Foundation page and directory structure. But cant figure it out.
I realized I don't need to turn = into ~...it doesn't really matter
search engine wise...Amazon.com does it.
My base URL for interchange is http://www.fashionfantasies.net/shop/ff
shop is a ScriptAlias for cgi-bin (which is below the DocumentRoot) ff
is the Interchange link program in the cgi-bin.
Thanks for your help so far,
Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: interchange-users-admin@icdevgroup.org
[mailto:interchange-users-admin@icdevgroup.org] On Behalf Of Dan
Browning
Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 12:41 PM
To: interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
Subject: Re: [ic] Modifying link program and links to get rid of ?s and
&'s in URL
At 12:18 PM 7/6/2002 -1000, you wrote:
>Most people don't realize but most search engines won't index a page if
>it has &s or ?s in the URL. Has anyone discovered a way to modify
>interchange so it'll use slashes instead? (and ~ instead of =)to make
>the pages browser friendly.
Here are three suggestions:
* Generate a static version of the site (not currently working, see
URL)
http://interchange.redhat.com/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=419
* Generate your own static "entry" page for submission and remove
?,&,=
with a script (this is what I'm currently doing).
* (Best solution, IMHO)
- Build a complex Apache rewrite code to translate
?a=123&b=456 into /a/eq/123/and/b/eq/456 and back.
- Or, mod Interchange to have an option to do the same.
Also please note:
<interchange-users guidelines>
-- Contextual quoting is preferred, i.e.
Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
> Some limited text that will give context.
>
Your reply.
versus
Your reply, lazily put at the top.
Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
> The whole big blob of the previous posts, including
> signatures and all
In fact, the author of the program stops following a thread
the moment this lazy quoting method is used. He figures that
if you can't take half a minute of your time to save multiple
minutes of the readers time, the heck with ya.
</interchange-users guidelines>
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Dan Browning, Kavod Technologies <db@kavod.com>
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A day for firm decisions!!!!! Or is it?
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
interchange-users@icdevgroup.org
http://www.icdevgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users