[ic] whats is the $ATTRHASH

[interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com (Dan Browning)]

At 01:28 PM 4/4/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>I dont get it.
>
>At 17:17 4/4/02 +0200, you wrote:
>>"Korey G." <korey@awpg.com> writes:
>>
>> > What is the $ATTRHASH.
>>
>>Anyone knows instantly what this $QUESTION is about.
>>
>>Ciao
>>         Racke

Ah, the irony.

BTW,

<interchange-users guidelines>
-- Contextual quoting is preferred, i.e.

                 Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
                 > Some limited text that will give context.
                 >

                 Your reply.

     versus

                 Your reply, lazily put at the top.

                 Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
                 > The whole big blob of the previous posts, including
                 > signatures and all

         In fact, the author of the program stops following a thread
         the moment this lazy quoting method is used. He figures that
         if you can't take half a minute of your time to save multiple
         minutes of the readers time, the heck with ya.
</interchange-users guidelines>

I would add to that this reference to a guide on message editing and quoting:

http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mail/edit.html


+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| Dan Browning, Kavod Technologies <db@kavod.com>
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are no data that cannot be plotted on a straight line if the axis
are chosen correctly.