
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Interchange by date
][Interchange by thread
]
RE: [ic] Help with IC setup
> > It *is* allowed, but qouting the whole old very very long
> email is not
> > good or qouting the old emails and writing the own message
> at the top of
> > the old email is not good too.
>
> Sounds good. I'll keep that in mind for future posts.
>
> Does this list require the response to be at the beginning,
> end or mixed
> within the message?
>
> Tom Carroll
<interchange-users guidelines>
-- Contextual quoting is preferred, i.e.
Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
> Some limited text that will give context.
>
Your reply.
versus
Your reply, lazily put at the top.
Quoting user1 (<user1@somedomain.redhat.com>):
> The whole big blob of the previous posts, including
> signatures and all
In fact, the author of the program stops following a thread
the moment this lazy quoting method is used. He figures that
if you can't take half a minute of your time to save multiple
minutes of the readers time, the heck with ya.
</interchange-users guidelines>
While I think replying at the beginning is clearly unfavored, I replies
mixed within the message should be fine (since they are really just
multiple replies each at the end of a quoted block).
HAND,
Dan Browning
Kavod Technologies
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users