[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Interchange by date ][Interchange by thread ]

Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8

To: interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
From: racke@linuxia.de (Stefan Hornburg (Racke))
Date: 18 Sep 2001 02:55:57 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Sturgisrally.net"'s message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2001 12:31:06 -0600"
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0109171343100.10346-100000@ns.my-school.com> <3BA63D65.ACDD2A55@namisolutions.com> <007e01c13fa6$ea8b4000$0100a8c0@home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef)

"Sturgisrally.net" <corey@sturgisrally.net> writes:

> There are a few problems with charging for this mailing list ...

Forget this. Charging is definitely a bad idea and it won't work
for sure. But IC/RedHat should be definitely more creative in
lining up resources from the IC developers around the world.

Ciao
        Racke

-- 
Racke happily hacks Interchange and maintains Debian packages like Courier.

For projects and other business stuff please refer to COBOLT NetServices
(URL: http://www.cobolt.net; Email: info@cobolt.net; Phone: 0041-1-3884400)
_______________________________________________
interchange-users mailing list
interchange-users@interchange.redhat.com
http://interchange.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/interchange-users

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
  - From: IC-Admin <interchange@my-school.com>
- Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
  - From: cfm@maine.com

References:
- Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
  - From: IC-Admin <interchange@my-school.com>
- Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
  - From: "Nathan D. Olmscheid" <nathan@namisolutions.com>
- Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
  - From: "Sturgisrally.net" <corey@sturgisrally.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
Next by Date: Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
Prev by thread: Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
Next by thread: Re: [ic] Frustrated with IC 4.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread